is ps3 more powerful than xbox 360 ?🤔
Started by ImPanda123




4 posts in this topic
ImPanda123
Member


0
1 posts 1 threads Joined: Jul 2018
07-24-2018, 05:47 PM -
#1
Just asking
Ani
Administrator
*******


16
4,318 posts 105 threads Joined: Aug 2017
07-24-2018, 09:14 PM -
#2
Yes
    Desktop: Ryzen 7 5800X,   Radeon RX 6800 XT, 2x8G DDR4 3600MHz, Manjaro Linux
     Laptop: Ryzen 9 5900HX,  Radeon RX 6700M,   2x8G DDR4 3200MHz, Manjaro Linux
Old Desktop: AMD FX-8350,     Radeon R9 280X,    2x4G DDR3 1600MHz, Manjaro Linux
Pikota
Member


0
3 posts 2 threads Joined: Jul 2018
07-29-2018, 07:37 PM -
#3
No, games have always had better performance on Xbox because this is more powerful.
theDreamcaster
Member


0
73 posts 0 threads Joined: Jul 2018
02-08-2019, 12:05 AM -
#4
(07-29-2018, 07:37 PM)Pikota Wrote: No, games have always had better performance on Xbox because this is more powerful.
hope youre joking...ps3 was of course more powerful than 360.  multiplatform games had better performance on 360 since ps3 was always under utilized. But if you compare first party titles, the 360's best were well behind ps3's.  for example the 360 halo games look like ps2 games compared to killzone 2 and 3 and nothing on 360 can touch the Uncharted series...but i refuse to get into console wars on such ancient hardware xD
RPCS3_FAN
Member


0
40 posts 9 threads Joined: Dec 2017
02-08-2019, 08:37 PM -
#5
it depends the cell cpu was hard to code so they did not utilized the features so the xbox was ahead.


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)