11-04-2017, 08:23 PM -
(11-02-2017, 03:50 AM)legend80 Wrote: How is that not a valid build name? It's from the emulator....0.0.3-6652 should be enough to move a game on the forum I would think.
If you're going to be so strict on the name, why don't you post something about how to acquire the one you guys require and link to that in these replies instead of vague statements and punishing me for not getting it right be demoting it? I'm trying to help here and thought I supplied 3/3 things you wanted.
You should look first before asking
Not only you didn't provide a proper build name (which contains the Commit ID, which is needed for the compatibility script to pick up what build you used), but you also used an invalid build (aka non master build). Although the build may not affect the game negatively, every report needs to be on a master build.
Please have a read at the guidelines.
Master builds list: https://rpcs3.net/compatibility?b
Quote:The compatibility is constantly changing so I think you guys should consider loosening up slightly on these status changes. Like why is a log required as an example? Is anyone looking at those and confirming something there? Shouldn't the screenshot be proof enough?
- So other people can see what settings you used
- So we can verify if the game is a bad pirated copy and remove the submission
- So we can look for desired outputs that help implementing/fixing certain parts of the code
Moved back to Loadable as a non-master build was used for the submission.
Desktop: Ryzen 7 5800X, Radeon RX 6800 XT, 2x8G DDR4 3600MHz, Manjaro Linux
Laptop: Ryzen 9 5900HX, Radeon RX 6700M, 2x8G DDR4 3200MHz, Manjaro Linux
Old Desktop: AMD FX-8350, Radeon R9 280X, 2x4G DDR3 1600MHz, Manjaro Linux
Laptop: Ryzen 9 5900HX, Radeon RX 6700M, 2x8G DDR4 3200MHz, Manjaro Linux
Old Desktop: AMD FX-8350, Radeon R9 280X, 2x4G DDR3 1600MHz, Manjaro Linux