General Build Question
Started by SSJGOGETA
Subscribe to this thread




3 posts in this topic
SSJGOGETA
Member


0
2 posts 1 threads Joined: Mar 2020
Big Grin  03-17-2020, 05:19 PM -
#1
Hello there everyone, newbie here posting my first question. I have done most of the research, but I wanted to reach out to this community and get the final saying on the topic that I am a bit torn. So I am planning to build a Retro Gaming PC which will house all the emulation that we have so far. And if I still have more power to spare, I might as well make this my Gaming PC All Around. I was almost ready to order my hardware, but when I posted the question on Reddit, I was told that RPCS3 heavily favorites Intel Processors even tho AMD Ryzen has been added to Approved CPU Requirement. I ask this wonderful community to look over my Config and let me know which way I should go. I appreciate everyone's time on this question. 

AMD Quick Config Info:
  • Ryzen 3700x 8C/16T
  • 32GB System Ram
  • RTX 2070 Super

Intel Quick Config Info:
  • i9-9900K
  • 32GB System Ram
  • RTX 2070 Super
I was leaning towards AMD because of the price difference, but then at the same time, I want a CPU that will handle all emulation/gaming going forward. So share your feedback on the above config and let me know what is the best way to go.

Thank you Big Grin
Reply
Ani
Administrator
*******


16
4,275 posts 105 threads Joined: Aug 2017
03-17-2020, 09:04 PM -
#2
In terms of performance, 9900K is better. It depends on how much money you want to spend.
Reply
    Desktop: Ryzen 7 5800X,   Radeon RX 6800 XT, 2x8G DDR4 3600MHz, Manjaro Linux
     Laptop: Ryzen 9 5900HX,  Radeon RX 6700M,   2x8G DDR4 3200MHz, Manjaro Linux
Old Desktop: AMD FX-8350,     Radeon R9 280X,    2x4G DDR3 1600MHz, Manjaro Linux
SSJGOGETA
Member


0
2 posts 1 threads Joined: Mar 2020
03-17-2020, 09:15 PM -
#3
(03-17-2020, 09:04 PM)Ani Wrote: In terms of performance, 9900K is better. It depends on how much money you want to spend.

Lol at the moment I am trying to keep it below $2000 (if possible). But then at the same time I now 10th gen is coming out and I am wondering if I should wait for it or just get the 9900k now. And if Tom's Hardware is correct, then the (Core i9-10900K) might cost $562+ when available.
Reply
pelsiek
Member


0
1 posts 0 threads Joined: Mar 2020
03-29-2020, 02:06 PM -
#4
(03-17-2020, 09:15 PM)SSJGOGETA Wrote:
(03-17-2020, 09:04 PM)Ani Wrote: In terms of performance, 9900K is better. It depends on how much money you want to walmartone spend.

Lol at the moment I am trying to keep it below $2000 (if possible). But then at the same time I now 10th gen is coming out and I am wondering if I should wait for it or just get the 9900k now. And if Tom's Hardware is correct, then the (Core i9-10900K) might cost $562+ when available.
Thank you very much.
This post was last modified: 03-31-2020, 01:01 PM by pelsiek.
Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)