it's now playable. turns out it's been. it was always a super white and shinny (bloom). how to fix it. white color buffer(enable it) the rest is just texture haze. (most settings are personal preference for performance and latency reasons.)
i do have logs. pastebin didn't work raw text was too much 48MB. so i'm using discord. a server i'll probably never delete. i have it compressed 6.3MB. let me know if there is a better way and i'll gladly do it. https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/1...c33fe29e47& keep in mind in case it shows up in logs. after i read no patches i removed disable motion blur patch. it runs the same. i just don't like motion blur. it was towards the end i did it tho.
idk what else is needed. i'm using https://forums.rpcs3.net/thread-196671.html as a guideline. any inquires are implored, guidance might be required. given i have the resources to do so.
This post was last modified: 03-26-2025, 05:15 AM by IncredibleGeek.
Edit Reason: uploading compressed log file
NPUA90661 ID doesn't exist for this games, NPUA80661 does. Anyway the thread for that ID exists so moving this to General Discussion until the post gets fixed so it can be merged.
(03-19-2025, 04:52 PM)Ani Wrote: Log file and image attachments should be uploaded directly to the post, let me know if you can't upload them for some reason, otherwise looks good
as stated previously. no i wasn't able to upload it directly. winrar only gives 2 options. rar and zip. i did zip since it's more common. i couldn't upload main log. the site says you don't support the format. i've even tried doing a snippet of it allowing it to be 3MB.
so if there is any other way you know of. please let me know. i've tried (.log, .txt, and .zip). i was able to do picture. it's not full size. i had to use snipping tool.
and this is the Full Game.
This post was last modified: 03-21-2025, 04:38 PM by IncredibleGeek.
Edit Reason: forgot to respond to a question.
(03-25-2025, 02:58 PM)Ani Wrote: You can't upload either .rar or .zip, they are blocked.
You need to use modern compression tools like 7-Zip or NanaZip and compress to .7z or .gz.
my bad i didn't know. yea i read the guideline. but to someone who is tech savvy. reading "You must compress your RPCS3.log file into a .7z or .gz file before attaching them to your post. Single archive size limit is 8MB."
that tells me. compress the file. and since most sites use .zip or .7zip. i figured they are only implying to compress the file to conserve server space. and since 7zip is build into system32 i got winrar. no point in downloading a redundant software.
Just out of curiosity, are you suggesting that those are the only modern compression tools available, or are you more broadly indicating that these represent some of the typical formats used in modern compression tools, and they’re the ones we tend to rely on?
7-zip does not come with Windows, you have to manually download and install it. Then you can compress to .7z using LZMA2 Ultra. I haven't heard of .7zip, sounds like a really old deprecated alias for .7z.
WinRar is proprietary software from the Windows XP era, no one tech savvy uses that anymore, 7-zip can also read the .rar format, which is a proprietary format that also compresses worst than LZMA2, thus it is utterly useless.
.zip has poor to near zero compression, so it is also useless if you actually want to do some compression and not only do a tarball-like archive.
We use .7z and .gz since they are the formats allowing for the best compression, and they're also open source.
(Yesterday, 04:38 PM)Ani Wrote: 7-zip does not come with Windows, you have to manually download and install it. Then you can compress to .7z using LZMA2 Ultra. I haven't heard of .7zip, sounds like a really old deprecated alias for .7z.
WinRar is proprietary software from the Windows XP era, no one tech savvy uses that anymore, 7-zip can also read the .rar format, which is a proprietary format that also compresses worst than LZMA2, thus it is utterly useless.
.zip has poor to near zero compression, so it is also useless if you actually want to do some compression and not only do a tarball-like archive.
We use .7z and .gz since they are the formats allowing for the best compression, and they're also open source.
yea. i wasn't saying the software did. i misspoke and was talking about .zip the built in compression feature using shell32.dll.
as for no one tech savvy.... you can only speak for yourself not others. it's subjective. 7-zip can read .rar so it must not be that bad since winrar can do the same. if it was useless it wouldn't exist anymore like netscape.
.zip is probably the worst since i think that one is windows 7zip. winzip is better than that and that one is crap. regardless plenty of internet people still use the .winrar format. i have nothing against 7-zip. so idk what's with the hostility and ridiculing of it.
i am for open source. hell i have my own linux pc setup as a self hosted relay server. personally i'd use 7zip if everyone did. but since i notice not everyone does and some will not accept .7zip since it's blasphemy to them.
hence having winrar. also they were made literally 4 yrs apart. so it's not ancient. 1999 was 7zip literally xp time as well.
personally my actual preference. if it was possible. linux all the way gaming etc. and use gzip, it's more streamline and with dpkg it makes unziping files installable super easy(usually with tarball). but to archive things xz. it's insane how much it compresses. but that's idealistic.
lastly the other reason i used winrar. netbooks aren't that powerful i didn't have a powerful setup from the get go. also time constrants winrar is less strain especially on crappy laptops you have to troubleshoot others things as an IT. but when that's not a concern and you have a powerful setup. 7zip since it's no sweat. i take a pragmatic approach rather than absolutist. but that is my subjective view. i was only asking a clarification question not challenging you. sorry that i touched on a touchy subject. my bad.
This post was last modified: Yesterday, 10:23 PM by IncredibleGeek.
