Fighting Games - a serious dilemma.

I have noticed, from testing many fighting games, that most of those labled as "playable" are not in fact playable, barely running at all with sever audio glitches and massive graphical issues.

On the other hand..the one figthing game that is actually 100% playable, Mortal Kombat 9 - MK vs DC Universe..is labled as in game. There are minor graphical issues, none of which interfere with gameplay in any way.

Yet this game has been stuck labled in game for quite some time

Meanwhile games such as

Dot hack vs - 15fps 
Soul Calibur 2 HD - severe audio issues, graphical issues, 15fps during menus 
Soul Calibur 4 and 5 - same as above
Tekken 6 - same as above

are all labled as playable, despite the fact they are not playable in any way.

To me, a fighting game is playable only when it runs at an acceptable frame rate and has nothing on screen that intereferes with gameplay.
To my knowledge, the only fighting game I have found on the PS3 that meets these criteria is MK9, and it is incorrectly, IMO , labled as In game. I have beaten the story and completed the arcade ladder on two difficulties..

Please correct this, and also, give some thought into having stricter regulations in regards to labelling fighting games.

Thanks for your time.