Rule for "playable" game ?
Started by vlj




4 posts in this topic
vlj
Unregistered


 
08-13-2015, 11:00 PM -
#1
Hi,
since there are more and more game that gets the "playable" status I think we should try to keep record of some information.

I think it's unavoidable that some working game will be broken later so I think any thread saying a game works should absolutly report the commit somewhere easily accessible. If the game is broken and is reworking later, a new "working commit" should be recorded too.
It's much easier to bisect with git using commit SHA that a more vague date or month, not accounting that it's possible that a game is working in a branch and not in master.

On another note, Arkedo 2 still lacks sound effect since spurs is not implemented. So while it's playable (near stable 60 fps, it's possible to play a game and "finish it" after some amount of time) it's not perfect emulation. On the other hand Sonic CD has proper sound effect, high fps and I think it's possible to finish the game. So it should have another status.


Messages In This Thread
RE: Rule for "playable" game ? - by vlj - 08-13-2015, 11:00 PM
RE: Rule for "playable" game ? - by tambre - 08-14-2015, 05:02 AM
RE: Rule for "playable" game ? - by Kilowog01 - 02-07-2016, 08:04 AM
RE: Rule for "playable" game ? - by tambre - 02-07-2016, 08:11 AM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)