Performance question - Printable Version +- RPCS3 Forums (https://forums.rpcs3.net) +-- Forum: Community (https://forums.rpcs3.net/forumdisplay.php?fid=1) +--- Forum: General Discussion (https://forums.rpcs3.net/forumdisplay.php?fid=16) +--- Thread: Performance question (/showthread.php?tid=197899) |
Performance question - albundy - 01-17-2018 Hi, because i want to buy new hardware i have a question: What makes more sense for running - not recompiling - ps3-software? A cpu with highest GHz or a cpu with many cores. In other words, does rpcs3 spread ps3-threads to cpu-threads? Many thanks for any answer. RE: Performance question - Ani - 01-17-2018 You need a CPU with good IPC, architecture and many cores all together. RPCS3 multi-threads very well. moar GHZ and cores doesn't necessarily relate to performance, you can have a CPU like FX-8350 which has 8 cores and 4.0GHz base clock, yet the CPU is garbage. i7 8700K is recommended right now, good clock, good IPC and 6 cores 12 threads. RE: Performance question - albundy - 01-17-2018 (01-17-2018, 03:10 PM)Ani Wrote: You need a CPU with good IPC, architecture and many cores all together. RPCS3 multi-threads very well. Thanks for your answer. Because i use a notebook with an core i5-4200m i think i will upgrade to an i7-7700HQ. RE: Performance question - Ani - 01-18-2018 7700HQ is fine. If you can wait for 8700HQ, even better. Has 2 extra cores and 4 more threads. RE: Performance question - RPCS3_FAN - 01-22-2018 (01-18-2018, 04:03 PM)Ani Wrote: 7700HQ is fine. weren't all AMD CPUs before Ryzen Garbage? AFAIK is Intel still better in Single Core Performance than Ryzen. RE: Performance question - Ani - 01-22-2018 All AMD CPUs before Ryzen are bad nowadays, Piledriver and Bulldozer have garbage architecture and they're garbage. What does that have to do with my comment though? |