+- RPCS3 Forums (https://forums.rpcs3.net)
+-- Forum: PS3 Commercial Games (https://forums.rpcs3.net/forumdisplay.php?fid=4)
+--- Forum: Ingame (https://forums.rpcs3.net/forumdisplay.php?fid=6)
+--- Thread: Far Cry 2 [BLUS30178] (/showthread.php?tid=197807)
Far Cry 2 [BLUS30178] - GrantKane - 01-06-2018
RPCS3 v0.0.4-6300-19d181fa Alpha | HEAD
Ingame.
![[Image: M7PesIB.png]](https://i.imgur.com/M7PesIB.png)
![[Image: yk4BBFF.jpg]](https://i.imgur.com/yk4BBFF.jpg)
RE: Far Cry 2 [BLUS30178] - dio - 10-06-2019
Status:
Still Ingame, but only because of performance reasons. Might be Playable on stronger hardware.
Required settings:
Write Color Buffers: true
Recommended settings:
Preferred SPU Threads: 2
SPU loop detection: false
Max SPURS Threads: 3
Approximate xfloat: false
Renderer: Vulkan
Disable ZCull Occlusion Queries: true
Resolution Scale: 200
Vblank Rate: 120
Log: {sys_net: Fatal, cellNetCtl: Fatal}
Notes:
- The game seems to find new shaders and SPU modules no matter how many times I reload the same level, meaning that already seen shaders and SPU modules are not being properly recognized.
- The game very heavily spams network requests, which is why its recommended to have the related logging disabled.
- On my machine, using resolution scale quickly resulted in a "VRAM full" situation. Apply accordingly. (I have only 1 gigabytes of VRAM though, worths noting.)
- The game hovers around 5 fps for me (with res scaling at 100%) normally, around 23 fps when looking up at the sky, and around 13 fps with Null renderer. The game runs at locked 30 for @"RainbowCookie" on his AMD R7 1700 CPU with Null renderer, sometimes going even higher up to 40 fps; hovers around 7-10 fps for him otherwise.
- Thanks to @"RainbowCookie"'s testing, the game is confirmed to be fully compatible with the vblank override, hence I listed it among the settings.
- The initial cache building might be rough.
- Both the base version and the updated version perform and behave the same.
My system:
CPU: Intel Core i5 4440 @ 3.1 GHz
RAM: 2x4 GB DDR3 @ 1600 MHz
GPU: AMD Radeon HD 7700 (GHz Edition) (1 GB VRAM)
OS: Windows 8.1 Pro (v. 6.3 b. 9600)
FW: 4.84
EMU: RPCS3 v0.0.7-8834-aa659f3c Alpha
Image proof:
![[Image: unknown.png]](https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/528905341744709642/630521949042245632/unknown.png)
Logs:
RPCS3.log.gz (Size: 817.1 KB / Downloads: 0)
RE: Far Cry 2 [BLUS30178] - crispy81 - 10-08-2019
Using those settings, I get about 10 - 12 fps for the cab ride at the start. Unacceptable to be playable. Once I started playing, was hovering around the 14fps mark. Also unacceptable to be deemed playable.
RE: Far Cry 2 [BLUS30178] - dio - 10-09-2019
(10-08-2019, 12:03 AM)crispy81 Wrote: Using those settings, I get about 10 - 12 fps for the cab ride at the start. Unacceptable to be playable. Once I started playing, was hovering around the 14fps mark. Also unacceptable to be deemed playable.
What CPU?
RE: Far Cry 2 [BLUS30178] - crispy81 - 10-09-2019
Intel® Core™ i7-8700K CPU @ 3.70GHz | 12 Threads | 31.93 GiB RAM | TSC: Bad | AVX+ | TSX
RE: Far Cry 2 [BLUS30178] - dio - 10-10-2019
Definitely not playable then yet, yeah, lol.
RE: Far Cry 2 [BLUS30178] - techguy95 - 01-05-2024
Almost playable for me. Fps jumps from 15-25. Average is 20fps.
Graphics render fine.
Settings: Allow host GPU labels, Write color buffers.
Specs: AMD Ryzen 5 1600 Six-Core Processor | 12 Threads | 15.95 GiB RAM | TSC: 3.200GHz | AVX+ | FMA3
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070' running on driver 546.33.0.0.
Firmware version: 4.90.
Playing using: RPCS3 v0.0.30-15914-2a1af17f Alpha | master
Operating System: Win 10.