RPCS3 v0.0.10-10518-c764925b Alpha | HEAD | Firmware version: 4.86
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X 12-Core Processor | 24 Threads | 31.95 GiB RAM | TSC: 3.793GHz | AVX+ | FMA3
Operating system: Windows, Major: 10, Minor: 0, Build: 18363, Service Pack: none, Compatibility mode: 0
RSX: Found vulkan-compatible GPU: 'GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER' running on driver 446.14.0.0
stats: playable
ingame stable at 25 to 30 fps all the time.
it's fine and no crash or freeze at all
log file and screenshots in Attachment
When are you guys gonna update the status for the other versions of the game? I'm pretty sure most if not all the other versions of sr3 run about the same as the US version. I've done a test on the BLES01748 version and it runs about the same and is fully beatable.
(10-19-2023, 04:02 AM)MidNightBear24 Wrote: [ -> ]When are you guys gonna update the status for the other versions of the game? I'm pretty sure most if not all the other versions of sr3 run about the same as the US version. I've done a test on the BLES01748 version and it runs about the same and is fully beatable.
I think that is what the forums are for. This is why I rummage these post daily. Seeing if something may need an update on the list and I post a video with current results. The team making the emu are all doing it in their spare time. So if you have a game that isn't shown in a status you think it should be, post it here. I trust the forums more than the list, because it has more input.
This game shouldn't be listed as playable, according to wiki it still has issues. This report only shows the prologue which isn't enough to know if the game is truly playable, even the video shows that the specs in the report seem to struggle with this game so there's no way a 3600 or 8700k which still meets recommended specs can run this properly.
It plays perfectly fine for me, so far. BUT I'm not saying it should be listed as playable... That log file is rather large, around 10mb, so something may need to be looked into.
Here is another video from another section in game and my log file.
YTvideo:
https://youtu.be/gm9v_4CUlHU
LogFile:
https://www.mediafire.com/file/myexjc33y...29.gz/file
I posted this in wrong thread, as the version I have is Saints Row: The Third - The Full Package [BLUS31062] and can't seem to be able to delete and move my comment. -sorry-
(11-21-2023, 10:50 AM)FlexBy Wrote: [ -> ]This game shouldn't be listed as playable, according to wiki it still has issues. This report only shows the prologue which isn't enough to know if the game is truly playable, even the video shows that the specs in the report seem to struggle with this game so there's no way a 3600 or 8700k which still meets recommended specs can run this properly.
I find it strange that, given the current advancements and price-to-performance ratio of CPUs, the 3600 remains the minimum requirement for this emulator. Until the RPCS3 optimized, I don’t foresee a change. In my opinion, these CPUs are outdated. However, I’m told that even if my high-end machine can run the emulator, it shouldn’t be considered functional if it doesn’t have a 3600 or an 8700k CPU (both of which had their heyday).
At this point, I’m unsure about the definition of compatibility. I’ve noticed many instances where a game was marked as playable, but an i9900k, which is by no means a minimum requirement CPU, was used for testing. No one mentioned this discrepancy. Yet, when I posted a few findings using my 3900x, which is a fairly advanced CPU, I received negative feedback stating it was too high-end for posting my findings.
All I’m asking for is consistency. How can we maintain a comprehensive compatibility list if it’s influenced by people’s biases?